Well, you know... let's see what we have here:

¤ a dude who has always existed...
¤ ...in the middle of absolute nothingness.
¤ whose future consists of continuing to exist in said nothingness

We don't know any of that. All we ``know'' is that there was nothingness in our plane of existance. It may well be that God is just playing a remarkably complex game of Conway's Life and showing all his friends the new shooter he created.

you know (according to the Bible) that He does tinker

None of those examples can be demonstrated to be anything more than natural occurrence. You cannot base proof of something on facts that require proof of the supposition. It's circular logic.