scarcasm aside, yes, there are many things we can know through experiment and demonstration, but that in itself doesnt prove there isnt a God.
I hope you dont think that i think im actualy out-right proving the existance of God, that still has to be taken by faith.

So what youre saying is "we will never be able to prove there isnt a god, but that you need zero proof that there is a god to believe"?

just doesnt make any sense.
you use science to disprove science, but I'm spose to "just believe" in some higher being for no reason?

what is that one thing that keeps you from beliving in God?

If there was proof of a god I would believe. I just can't toss my scientific curiosity out the window like some.

if there was no difaculty, there would be no faith, and hence no love

I don't suppose you could define this without using any metaphors...seems like complete gibberish.