Greetings!

I have read it. I still find that I disagree with both sets of judicial opinions. It is definately a constitutional issue, and will be debated. Most notable was the text of the original introduction of the phrase, based on a deliberate act which may alone be enough cause to strike the phrase. I still stand by my personal opinion that, deliberate as the original insertion may have been, I do not personally think that it is a government endorsement or enfranchisement of any religion any more than striking the phrase would be an endorsement of atheism.

Of course, your milage and opinions will vary, as well they should. I find it significantly better to see people actually paying attention to the pledge and to the constitution, even if I may not agree on some topics.