Unoffical empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

Topic Options
#98347 - 08/06/2002 09:20 Dodgy cp command on drive copying
andym
carpal tunnel

Registered: 17/01/2002
Posts: 3996
Loc: Manchester UK
I've just taken the plunge and started upgrading my no. 1 empeg to a 40G capacity. Anyway, I've followed the FAQ instructions implicitly and came across a small problem. I decided to copy all my fids from the old drive to the new one and found the command shown in the instructions doesn't work. A quick BBS search turned up a thread discussing this very topic. To cut a long story short, my empeg is now copying the fids using:
cp -auvfx /drive1/fids /drive0/

Is there any reason why this isn't in the upgrade instructions?
_________________________
Cheers,

Andy M

Top
#98348 - 08/06/2002 10:29 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: andym]
mtempsch
pooh-bah

Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
I think Tony wanted us first to all agree on which switches to use...
I did some serious disk juggling & copying back and forth when upgrading and at the same time moving from a MkI to a MkIIa, and all I used was cp -ax

didn't need -f since I had cleaned out the destinations previously
same for -u
didn't want -v since I didn't sit by the empeg while copying, and output sometimes can slow down the process... Probably not much of an issue in this case since each file is pretty large and therefor the overhead pretty small...

/Michael
_________________________
/Michael

Top
#98349 - 08/06/2002 12:05 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: mtempsch]
andym
carpal tunnel

Registered: 17/01/2002
Posts: 3996
Loc: Manchester UK
What I was trying to say was that the command shown in the instructions didn't work, at all. I needed to use the other commands to get the thing to copy. All I got otherwise was an error saying the argument list was too long...
_________________________
Cheers,

Andy M

Top
#98350 - 08/06/2002 13:58 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: andym]
mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
My only complaint about "cp -auvfx" is that it fails to create any required "empty directories" on the target. Or at least that's what it used to do for me.

ml


Edited by mlord (08/06/2002 13:59)

Top
#98351 - 08/06/2002 14:01 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: andym]
mtempsch
pooh-bah

Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
By the command in the instructions I take it you mean
cp -v /drive1/fids/* /drive0/fids

'Argument list to long' is a limitation in the shells command line parsing/management, IIRC. The fids/* expands to a list of all tunes and tags files - which can be quite a lot. It's normally addressed by copying smaller batches ( ie first all files where the name starts with 1, then those who start with 2 etc...) This has been mentioned on the BBS and should, IMHO, be in the FAQ if it's not. Tony?

cp -auvfx /drive1/fids /drive0/ (and variations) solves this by stepping up one level and then pointing to a single entry, the directory containing all the tunes & tags files, instead of listing all the individual files. cp then recurses down into the directory, the list of files is then managed by cp directly, instead of passing through the shell.

/Michael
_________________________
/Michael

Top
#98352 - 08/06/2002 14:17 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: mtempsch]
andym
carpal tunnel

Registered: 17/01/2002
Posts: 3996
Loc: Manchester UK
I'll make a note of this for future reference...
Thanks for your help. The empeg survived the transfer and I'm currently uploading all the albums I didn't have space for on the old drive
_________________________
Cheers,

Andy M

Top
#98353 - 08/06/2002 14:50 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: mtempsch]
tfabris
carpal tunnel

Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31600
Loc: Seattle, WA
I was unaware that the command listed in the drive upgrade guide was in error. I do not know Linux and was going on what others have told me.

I am changing it now to:

cp -auvfx /drive1/fids /drive0/

If any of you Linux-heads disagree on this, please hash out the results and let me know what the consensus is. Since I know nothing about Linux, I depend totally on this BBS to supply me with information in that area. If you guys sit and argue about something in a thread and don't reach a resolution, I can't ever update this information in the FAQ.
_________________________
Tony Fabris

Top
#98354 - 08/06/2002 14:57 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: tfabris]
mtempsch
pooh-bah

Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
Fair enough

/Michael
_________________________
/Michael

Top
#98355 - 10/06/2002 04:59 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: andym]
SE_Sport_Driver
carpal tunnel

Registered: 05/01/2001
Posts: 4903
Loc: Detroit, MI USA
I think that was me that had the hard time copying such a large number of files... Thanks again to everyone that helped out.
_________________________
Brad B.

Top
#98356 - 10/06/2002 05:57 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: SE_Sport_Driver]
andym
carpal tunnel

Registered: 17/01/2002
Posts: 3996
Loc: Manchester UK
Yes, although my efforts were sort of wasted as I ended up sticking the old 20G drive in empeg as well. So I finally have a 60G empeg. Woo-hoo!
_________________________
Cheers,

Andy M

Top
#98357 - 11/06/2002 03:26 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: mtempsch]
tms13
old hand

Registered: 30/07/2001
Posts: 1115
Loc: Lochcarron and Edinburgh
In reply to:

'Argument list to long' is a limitation in the shells command line parsing/management, IIRC.


It's slightly deeper than that - it's a limitation of the exec() system call of the kernel, that the shell uses to start the cp process. No change you could make to the shell can increase the maximum argument list. Sorry!
_________________________
Toby Speight
030103016 (80GB Mk2a, blue)
030102806 (0GB Mk2a, blue)

Top
#98358 - 11/06/2002 05:01 Re: Dodgy cp command on drive copying [Re: tms13]
mtempsch
pooh-bah

Registered: 02/06/2000
Posts: 1996
Loc: Gothenburg, Sweden
Short of making the shell smart enough to know how/if it could chop up one call into multiple calls...

Thanks for the clarification - learn something new every day.

/Michael
_________________________
/Michael

Top