And Another Thing...

Posted by: Phoenix42

And Another Thing... - 23/11/2009 15:06

I'm surprised there has yet to be a discussion on Eoin Colfer's addition to the Hitchhiker's series.
I'm slowing making my way through the copy I picked up in Ireland last month. Slowing because life keeps getting in the way, and also because, well it isn't holding my attention as well as the others. Having said that it was a long time ago that I read the others, so they may not hold my attention now - though I do enjoy listening to them.
Posted by: peter

Re: And Another Thing... - 23/11/2009 16:02

I was initially very sceptical about it, but that hardened into extremely sceptical after an interview in which he appears to be saying that he jollied it up a bit by sticking in cameos by the characters from his Artemis Fowl books.

Right now I've got it filed in the same category as the Matrix sequels, the Star Wars prequels, post-Goscinny Asterix, Heroes after the first series, the third Gormenghast book, Foundation books after the first three, and Dune books after the first one. But I'd be very pleased to hear whether it should come out of that box.

Peter
Posted by: hybrid8

Re: And Another Thing... - 23/11/2009 16:53

I didn't think it was out yet. I'm with Peter in terms of being skeptical, but I think I'm willing to give it a try, since I don't have any other works of fiction lining up at the moment for a read.
Posted by: tfabris

Re: And Another Thing... - 23/11/2009 17:32

Originally Posted By: peter
I was initially very sceptical about it, but that hardened into extremely sceptical after an interview in which he appears to be saying that he jollied it up a bit by sticking in cameos by the characters from his Artemis Fowl books.


The "Mel Brooks" comment is what made me close the page. If he thinks he's more like Mel Brooks than Python, he's not getting the point of what Douglas' work was about. Spaceballs was just awful.
Posted by: hybrid8

Re: And Another Thing... - 23/11/2009 21:59

Originally Posted By: tfabris
The "Mel Brooks" comment is what made me close the page. If he thinks he's more like Mel Brooks than Python, he's not getting the point of what Douglas' work was about. Spaceballs was just awful.


Clearly the producers and writers of the last Hitchhiker's movie didn't understand that either and that's why the movie completely and utterly sucked. Though I do recall most people here didn't think it was that bad when it premiered.

Has anyone changed their minds about it? I still think it's ultra-terrible and was badly cast to boot.

Adams' Hitchhikers series are my favorite books of all time. Period.
Posted by: tfabris

Re: And Another Thing... - 23/11/2009 22:05

I was one of the people who liked the film.

It was nothing like Spaceballs. smile
Posted by: wfaulk

Re: And Another Thing... - 24/11/2009 01:47

Originally Posted By: hybrid8
Clearly the ... writers of the last Hitchhiker's movie didn't understand that either and that's why the movie completely and utterly sucked.

You might want to look and see who the writer of the H2G2 movie was before you say that.
Posted by: hybrid8

Re: And Another Thing... - 24/11/2009 05:21

I know who the writer was. Well, who the writer was supposed to be. Instead we got Karey Kirkpatrick, who I was referring to, who wasn't able to pull off another Chicken Run and certainly not maintain the spirit of the books, IMO. Adams was long dead by the time the movie went into production and the screenplay received a lot of rework. Maybe it would have been worse without the rework, I don't know. But I do know that I felt totally ripped off after having seen it. The casting and direction didn't do much to help either.

It wasn't as good as Spaceballs, IMO. All in all I'd say that the movie would appeal more to someone who wasn't a fan of the books. This makes sense for obvious reasons, such as selling movie tickets to a wide audience. Though it's obvious many fans did also like it, I just wasn't one of them. Oh, and I do like all the actors in other roles - very much so in fact.