I can't imagine why the data would be lost. 20 gigs of data just lost? It would have had to be stored somewhere on the drive, no?

- Jon

Ok, I started this again, but this time, I eliminated the z option. It's going WAY faster. Hope it works this time. I followed the directions on the Lazy Bastard's Guide to the letter!

- Jon

Naw, there'd still be evidence somewhere, even if a couple of files were lost (Linux is extremely good about not losing much data, even when one royally screws up.

Oh well.. the bit gods have now be pacified.

-ml

Yay! The drive 0 transfer worked. Now working on the drive1 transfer!

Thank the freakin lord.

- Jon

Were you monitoring both ends on serial? You wouldn't get much if you, for example, used z option only on one end...

I was monitoring on the sending side. I did use the z option on both sides. No matter now, drive0 has been copied, and drive1 is copying now. I must have done something wrong the first time...

- Jon