#348613 - 30/10/2011 18:55
Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
I've been trying to install a Transcend 64GB SSD and I keep getting the above error when trying to load the developer image. I've tried re--downloading the image several times, but I get the same error.
I'm able to run the disk builder without errors, so I don't believe that I've got a bad cable or port (also: I'm able to run a pair of conventional drives without problems). I've double- and triple-checked the physical connections and they seem good (and if they were bad, the disk builder would error, wouldn't it?).
I've tried searching the forums. but haven't found anything yet that helps.
Can someone give me some help with this? I'm willing to believe that I've overlooked something, but I've no idea what that could be right now.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348614 - 30/10/2011 19:10
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
If it helps, I've got a couple Linux computers around here (Ubuntu and Xubuntu, but if I need to load another flavor, I'm able to do that).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348623 - 31/10/2011 00:08
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
|
MMmm.. really need to see the serial port output from the failure.
But you could try wiping the paritition table from the card and then try again -- that might be all that was wrong.
From a Linux box: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdX bs=512 count=1 ...where you replace "/dev/hdX" with the actual device path to the CFcard on the Linux box ("lsscsi").
-ml
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348645 - 31/10/2011 11:49
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: mlord]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
In case it makes a difference, this is an IDE SSD (v. an IDE CF setup).
I can get the serial port output tonight, when I get home from work (sadly, I don't have either the equipment or the employer tolerance to work on it now).
I've played with Linux a bit, but I'm still pretty unfamiliar with it...should I enter the command above (with "/dev/hd1" (I'm assuming that the laptop's HDD is "0" and the RioCar will be "1"))?
Edited by bauble (31/10/2011 12:22)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348646 - 31/10/2011 12:38
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
|
Oh, your earlier post suggested familiarity with Linux, but that's obviously not the case now. So, no, you should NOT even attempt the commands I suggested -- you'll likely lose everything on both systems if you try. Find a friend who knows this stuff, or perhaps somebody else here might help you through it (?). Cheers
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348650 - 31/10/2011 13:36
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: mlord]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
Sorry - I didn't mean to imply that I was any kind of a Linux adept; just that I have the OS running (and from looking at some posts, it seems that some things are done more easily through it).
FWIW, I don't have anything on either system (the SSD has only successfully run the disk builder and the Lunix systems were built so I could gain some familiarity with the OS, but they don't have anything other than a base load).
So...do I have anything to worry about, other than wiping the RioCar and the computer?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348655 - 31/10/2011 15:19
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
when trying to load the developer image. I've tried re--downloading the image several times, but I get the same error. Where are you getting this file? At least one of the files from the empeg.com web site is known to be corrupted. Are you using Mark Lord's bigdisk files from rtr.ca?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348658 - 31/10/2011 16:19
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: tfabris]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
I did use Mark Lord's disk builder.
But I pulled the image from the empeg.com website. Is there a better place to get it? (it would be great if that's all there is to the problem!)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348661 - 31/10/2011 20:20
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: tfabris]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
Thank you! I'll try the new image as soon as I get home.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348665 - 01/11/2011 01:07
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
Well, I was going to try the new image, but I couldn't get the disk builder to run. Here's the serial port output. Can someone take pity on a poor n00b and tell me what I'm doing wrong?
empeg audio-in initialised, CS4231A revision a0. empeg-car bootstrap v1.02 20 empeg remote control/panel button initialised. If there is anyone empeg usb initialised, PDIUSBD12 id 1012let them speak now, empeg state support initialised 0089/88c1 (save to d0005700).orever hold their peace...it seems not. Let fly the Penguins empeg RDS driver initialised empeg power-pic driver initialised (first boot) Copying kernel... empeg-car b RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size
empeg single cha hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drivere is anyone present who wants to ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffffr forever hold their peace...it seems n ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff554 Copying kernel... hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive20001106 (hugo@empeg.com) ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff If there is anyone present who want ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffffow, ide_data_test: wrote 0
ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff................................... don ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff55.2.17-rmk5-np17-empeg55-hijack-v508 (hi hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff95.3 20010315 (release)) #2 Fri Jan 9 1 ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff Proce ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff55 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive ide0: unexpected interrupt, status=0xff, count=1 ide0 at 0x000-0x007,0x038 on irq 6 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, 61136MB w/1kB Cache, CHS=7793/255/63 empeg-flash driver initialized smc chip id/revision 0x3349 smc9194.c:v0.12 03/06/96 by Erik Stahlman (erik@vt.edu)
SMC9194: SMC91C94(r:9) at 0x4008000 IRQ:7 INTF:TP MEM:6144b MAC 00:02:d7:26:09:f 2 Partition check: hdb: hdb1 < hdb5 hdb6 > hdb2 hdb3 hdb4 RAMDISK: ext2 filesystem found at block 0 RAMDISK: Loading 320 blocks [1 disk] into ram disk... done. EXT2-fs warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is recommended VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). empeg-pump v0.03 (19980601) Press Ctrl-A to enter pump...VFS: Cannot open root device 03:05 Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:05
empeg-car bootstrap v1.02 20001106 (hugo@empeg.com) If there is anyone present who wants to upgrade the flash, let them speak now, or forever hold their peace...it seems not. Let fly the Penguins of Linux!
e000 v1.04initialise Copying kernel... empeg audio- Calling linux kernel...r Uncompressing Linux..................................... done, booting the kerne USB: empeg usb initialised, PDIUSBD12 id 1012 l. Linux version 2.2.17-rmk5-np17-empeg55-hijack-v508 (hijack@rtr.ca) (gcc version empeg state support initialised 0089/88c1 (save to d0005b80).quest 2.95.3 20010315 (release)) #2 Fri Jan 9 16:06:35 EST 2009 show_ USB: Non-standard r empeg Processor: Intel StrongARM-1100 revision 11 USB: No empeg power-pic drive Checking for extra DRAM:) c1000000: wrote ffffffff, read e28cc001ver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.94.1 (c) 1998 Corel Computer Corp. USB: Non-stand empeg single chann empeg-car player (hardware revision 9, serial number 30102546) primary interface...USB: N USB: N ide_data Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.20000 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0x000 NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 USB: N ide_data_test IP Protocols: ICMP, U TCP: Hash tables configured (ehash 16384 bhas
Tuner: loopback=0, ID=-1 show_message("Hijack v508 by Mark Lord")ote 0x5555 read 0x0000 empeg display initialised.Non-standard reque empeg dsp audio initialisedD25-M, ATA DISK driveon-sta empeg dsp mixer initialised USB: empeg dsp initialisedte 0x0000 read 0x0000 CS4231A: not responding (39) --> no v USB: Non-standard empeg power-pic driver initialised (first boot)Non-standard request i RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K sizet empeg single channel IDE Probing primary interface...t: wrote 0xaaaa read 0x0000 ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3dSB: Non-standar ide_dat ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d hda: TS ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 USB: Non-s ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3d
ide_data_test: wrote ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d9 hda: TS6 ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3dStahlman (erik@vt.edu) ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28SB: Non-standard req ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xf63d8000 IRQ:7 INTF:TP MEM:6144b ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d0x000
ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28(priority -1) ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3dquestuest[1 disk] i ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d version 0, size = 24670208 bytes ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3 USB: Non-standa Setting maximal mount count t ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3dB Setting interval between check 0 s ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d USB: Non-standard requestdard re ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3dg hda4 filesysteshow_message("Making hd ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28request ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xf63d m mke2fs 1.14, 9-J ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d 0 blocks (0.00 ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee2
Tuning hda4 ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3d tune2fs 1.17, 26-Oct-19 ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d Setting i ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0 Mountin ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xf63dng hda4")
ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3dw_message("Making directories") ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d show_message("Remounting ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28ompleted show_message("hd ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xf63 Zeroing hda3
ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d Done!
ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 bash-2.01# empeg-car boots ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3dwants to upgrade ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 seems not. Let fly the Penguins of Lin ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3d
ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d Calling linux kernel... ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3dnux.................................... ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3drsion 2.2.17-rmk5-np17-empeg55-hijack-v ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3 ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3dmpeg-car player (hardware revision 9, s ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3dmem=16m Calibratin ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 Memory ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3deserved, 364k data, 4k init) Probing primary interface... ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3dorder 2, 16k) ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3dable entries: 16384 ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d.039 ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee281. ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xf63d TCP: Hash tab ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3dinux-2.2 (Dag Brattli) ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28kswapd v 1.5 SA110 ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xf63dial options enabled ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d ttyS00 at 0xf8010000 (irq = 15) is ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d ttyS01 at 0xf805 ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee2 USB ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 ID=-1d=5sult= ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3dk Lord")andard reque ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d empeg display initialised.est ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3dnitialisedd request ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28isedandard request: Non-standar ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3d empeg dsp initialised ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3dS4231A revision a0x ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d empeg remote control/panel butto ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28rd requestrevision 1 ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3
ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3dide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0x0000 ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28USB: Non- ide_data_test: wrote ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xd63d
USB: Non-standard r ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0x0000 ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d-standard requestrq = 17) is ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 wrote 0xffff read 0x0000 ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3dard request id ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3 ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0x0 ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 USB: Non-standard request ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3daa read 0x0000tandard request ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0 ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d USB: Non-st
ide_data_t ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 USB: Non-s ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d 0x ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d USB: ide_ ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 USB: Non-s ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xd63d0000 read 0x0000request ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0x ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0x ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee2 USB: Non-standard ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 read 0x0000-standard requestSD25-M, AT ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3d USB: Non-sta ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xfe3d Partition check:on-standard requ ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xfe3d hda5 hda6 > hda2 hda3 hda4 ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xee28 RAMDISK: ext2 filesystem found ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xfe3
Setting VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).72 bytesNon-standard req empeg-pump v0.03 (19980601) Press Ctrl-A to enter pump...VFS: Cannot open root device 03:05 (priority -1)standard requestequeste 0xaaaa read 0x000 Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:05 Setting up swapspace vers
empeg-car bootstrap v1.02 20001106 (hugo@empeg.com) If there is anyone present who wants to upgrade the flash, let them speak now, hda: USB: Non-standard request USB: Non-stand Calling linux kernel... ext2fs_che Uncompressing Linux..................................... done, booting the kerne USB: Non-s l.da Linux version 2.2.17-rmk5-np17-empeg55-hijack-v508 (hijack@rtr.ca) (gcc version USB: No Linux ext2 filesystem format 2.95.3 20010315 (release)) #2 Fri Jan 9 16:06:35 EST 2009 4096000, 7962624, 11239424, Processor: Intel StrongARM-1100 revision 11 Writing superblocks Checking for extra DRAM: information: done c1000000: wrote ffffffff, read e28cc001 Tuning hda4 NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.94.1 (c) 1998 Corel Cne2fs 1.17, 26-Oct-1999 for
Page cache hash table entries: 4096 (order 2, 16k) Done! show_message("Done POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX ide_data_test: wrote 0x00 Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa rea NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
ttyS01 at 0xf8050000 (irq = 17) is a SA1100 UART0000 ide_ ttyS02 at 0xf8030000 (irq = 16) is a SA1100 UART ide_data_test: wrote 0 Signature is 636f6972 'rioc'
Tuner: loopback=0, ID=-1SK drive show_message("Hijack v508 by Mark Lord")0000 read 0x0000 empeg display initialised.st: wrote 0xf empeg dsp audio initialised
empeg usb initialised, PDIUSBD12 id 1012 USB: Non-standard reque empeg state support initialised 0089/88c1 (save to d0005880). 0x0000 USB: Non-stand empeg RDS driver initialised ide_data_test: wrote empeg power-pic driver initialised (first boot) USB: N ide_data_te RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size USB: Non-stan USB: No hda empeg single channel IDEdrive Probing primary interface...ard reque ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff0000 ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff rea
hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drivendard request ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffffe_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0x0000 ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffffB: Non-standard request ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa:v0.12 03/06/96 by Erik Stahlman (erik@ ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff55
SMC919 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive7 INTF:TP MEM: ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa USB: N ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff55 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive ide0: unexpected interrupt, status=0xff, count=1 ide0 at 0x000-0x007,0x038 on irq 6 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, 61136MB w/1kB Cache, CHS=7793/255/63 empeg-flash driver initialized smc chip id/revision 0x3349 smc9194.c:v0.12 03/06/96 by Erik Stahlman (erik@vt.edu)
SMC9194: SMC91C94(r:9) at 0x4008000 IRQ:7 INTF:TP MEM:6144b MAC 00:02:d7:26:09:f 2 Partition check: hdb: hdb1 < hdb5 hdb6 > hdb2 hdb3 hdb4 RAMDISK: ext2 filesystem found at block 0 RAMDISK: Loading 320 blocks [1 disk] into ram disk... done. EXT2-fs warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is recommended VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). empeg-pump v0.03 (19980601) Press Ctrl-A to enter pump...VFS: Cannot open root device 03:05 Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:05
empeg-car bootstrap v1.02 20001106 (hugo@empeg.com) If there is anyone present who wants to upgrade the flash, let them speak now, or forever hold their peace...it seems not. Let fly the Penguins of Linux!
e000 v1.04 Copying kernel... Calling linux kernel... Uncompressing Linux..................................... done, booting the kerne l. Linux version 2.2.17-rmk5-np17-empeg55-hijack-v508 (hijack@rtr.ca) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)) #2 Fri Jan 9 16:06:35 EST 2009 Processor: Intel StrongARM-1100 revision 11 Checking for extra DRAM: c1000000: wrote ffffffff, read e28cc001 NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.94.1 (c) 1998 Corel Computer Corp. empeg-car player (hardware revision 9, serial number 30102546) Command line: mem=16m6028k swap-space (pri Calibrating delay loop... 207.67 BogoMIPS USB: Non-standard reques Memory: 15000k/16M available (996k code, 20k reserved, 364k data, 4k init)SB: Non-standard requestd request6k) Dentry hash table entries: 2048 (order 2, 16k) ext2fs_check_if_mount: No such file or direc Buffer cache hash table entries: 16384 (order 4, 64k) Page cache hash table entries: 4096 (order 2, 16k) hda4 is mounted. POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux ext2 filesystem for Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2
Filesystem l Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039group
NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.00, 7962624, 11239424, IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCPing inode tables: done TCP: Hash tables configured (ehash 16384 bhasilesystem show_ ttyS01 at 0xf8050000 (irq = 17) is a SA1100 UART Making directories show_m ttyS02 at 0xf8030000 (irq = 16) is a SA1100 UART Remounting ro show_me Signature is 636f6972 'rioc' hda4 Tuner: loopback=0, ID=-1how_message("hda4 comple show_message("Hijack v508 by Mark Lord")ng hda3 show_message("Zeroin empeg display initialised. /bin/cat: write empeg dsp audio initialisedce empeg dsp mixer initialised show_message("Done!") empeg dsp initialisedash-2.01#
empeg audio-in initialised, CS4231A r ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff NetWinder Floating Point Em ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaaorp. ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xffff: Non-standard requ hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive empeg-car player ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff2546) 16MB DRAM ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff USB: Non-standard request ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa Command line: mem=16m ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff55ng delay loop... 207.67 BogoMIPS hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive USB: Non-standard request ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffffailable (996k code, 20k reserved, 364k ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa Non-standard request P ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaar 2, 16k) ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff55 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive ide0: unexpected interrupt, status=0xff, count=1 ide0 at 0x000-0x007,0x038 on irq 6 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, 61136MB w/1kB Cache, CHS=7793/255/63 empeg-flash driver initialized smc chip id/revision 0x3349 smc9194.c:v0.12 03/06/96 by Erik Stahlman (erik@vt.edu)
SMC9194: SMC91C94(r:9) at 0x4008000 IRQ:7 INTF:TP MEM:6144b MAC 00:02:d7:26:09:f 2 Partition check: hdb: hdb1 < hdb5 hdb6 > hdb2 hdb3 hdb4 RAMDISK: ext2 filesystem found at block 0 RAMDISK: Loading 320 blocks [1 disk] into ram disk... done. EXT2-fs warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is recommended VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). empeg-pump v0.03 (19980601) Press Ctrl-A to enter pump...VFS: Cannot open root device 03:05 Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:05
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348667 - 01/11/2011 02:19
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
|
You need to use something other than hyperterminal -- it mangles the logs (as seen above) making them quite a bit less useful than they normally would be.
Most people eventually discover "putty" on windows. MUCH better than the silly little hyperterm thingie.
-ml
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348673 - 01/11/2011 02:30
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: mlord]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
I *thought* it looked garbled. I was afraid it indicated something was wrong.
I've conned one of my Linux-enabled friends to help me tomorrow. I'm assuming he'll be able to get a better serial port output. Is there anything else you can recommend (I know you don't have much info at this point; not trying to be pushy)?
And thank you *so* much (and to Mr. Fabris as well) for your help and suggestions so far.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348677 - 01/11/2011 04:24
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 21/02/2006
Posts: 325
|
Hi,
It certainly doesn't like the USB device that it sees.
Ross
_________________________
In SI, a little termination and attention to layout goes a long way. In EMC, without SI, you'll spend 80% of the effort on the last 3dB.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348678 - 01/11/2011 09:31
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: Ross Wellington]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
|
ide0: unexpected interrupt, status=0xff, count=1 That part looks bad, indicating a hardware fault. Most likely with where the IDE hard disk cable connects to the mainboard. The connector there (both parts) is extremely fragile, and frequently falls apart. This means, the ribbon cable half can separate from its connector, which sometimes is curable by recrimping it. But it more often means the "IDE header" (pins soldered to the mainboard) have broken their solder joints. Repairing those requires a practised and delicate touch with a temperature controlled soldering iron. Even just examining the connection requires good magnification to see the solder breaks. Capture / post a better copy of the serial log and then we'll know for sure. Cheers
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348679 - 01/11/2011 11:53
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: mlord]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
Ok - here's a copy of the output, using PuTTY:
empeg-car bootstrap v1.02 20001106 (hugo@empeg.com) If there is anyone present who wants to upgrade the flash, let them speak now, or forever hold their peace...it seems not. Let fly the Penguins of Linux!
e000 v1.04 Copying kernel... Calling linux kernel... Uncompressing Linux..................................... done, booting the kernel. Linux version 2.2.17-rmk5-np17-empeg55-hijack-v508 (hijack@rtr.ca) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)) #2 Fri Jan 9 16:06:35 EST 2009 Processor: Intel StrongARM-1100 revision 11 Checking for extra DRAM: c1000000: wrote ffffffff, read e28cc001 NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.94.1 (c) 1998 Corel Computer Corp. empeg-car player (hardware revision 9, serial number 30102546) 16MB DRAM Command line: mem=16m Calibrating delay loop... 207.67 BogoMIPS Memory: 15000k/16M available (996k code, 20k reserved, 364k data, 4k init) Dentry hash table entries: 2048 (order 2, 16k) Buffer cache hash table entries: 16384 (order 4, 64k) Page cache hash table entries: 4096 (order 2, 16k) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP TCP: Hash tables configured (ehash 16384 bhash 16384) IrDA (tm) Protocols for Linux-2.2 (Dag Brattli) Starting kswapd v 1.5 SA1100 serial driver version 4.27 with no serial options enabled ttyS00 at 0xf8010000 (irq = 15) is a SA1100 UART ttyS01 at 0xf8050000 (irq = 17) is a SA1100 UART ttyS02 at 0xf8030000 (irq = 16) is a SA1100 UART Signature is 636f6972 'rioc' Tuner: loopback=0, ID=-1 show_message("Hijack v508 by Mark Lord") empeg display initialised. empeg dsp audio initialised empeg dsp mixer initialised empeg dsp initialised empeg audio-in initialised, CS4231A revision a0 empeg remote control/panel button initialised. empeg usb initialised, PDIUSBD12 id 1012 empeg state support initialised 0089/88c1 (save to d0005980). empeg RDS driver initialised empeg power-pic driver initialised (first boot) RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size empeg single channel IDE Probing primary interface... ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff55 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xffff hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff55 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff55 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xffff hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive ide_data_test: wrote 0x0000 read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xffff read 0xffff ide_data_test: wrote 0xaaaa read 0xffaa ide_data_test: wrote 0x5555 read 0xff55 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive ide0: unexpected interrupt, status=0xff, count=1 ide0 at 0x000-0x007,0x038 on irq 6 hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, 61136MB w/1kB Cache, CHS=7793/255/63 empeg-flash driver initialized smc chip id/revision 0x3349 smc9194.c:v0.12 03/06/96 by Erik Stahlman (erik@vt.edu)
SMC9194: SMC91C94(r:9) at 0x4008000 IRQ:7 INTF:TP MEM:6144b MAC 00:02:d7:26:09:f2 Partition check: hdb: hdb1 < hdb5 hdb6 > hdb2 hdb3 hdb4 RAMDISK: ext2 filesystem found at block 0 RAMDISK: Loading 320 blocks [1 disk] into ram disk... done. EXT2-fs warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is recommended VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). empeg-pump v0.03 (19980601) Press Ctrl-A to enter pump...VFS: Cannot open root device 03:05 Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:05
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348680 - 01/11/2011 11:57
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
If there *is* a problem with the IDE header, would that keep the unit form running any drives? I've been running a couple conventional hard drives in it; and have been (carefully) swapping them into the unit when I get frustrated with the SSD.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348681 - 01/11/2011 13:38
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/06/1999
Posts: 7868
|
Is the SSD the only drive in the system when you made that log above?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348682 - 01/11/2011 14:10
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: drakino]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
|
Mmm.. okay, I'm betting that the drive error had something to do with the SSD being so much quicker at starting up than a mechanical drive. So it's probably harmless. You can disregard my earlier comments on it, now that we've got a proper boot log (nice job!).
So now you just need some kinder person to walk you through the s/w install on the drive. Looks like you're close already.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348683 - 01/11/2011 14:17
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: drakino]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
Are you sure? I posted the below before seeing your message. Am I overlooking something again?
It is (the only drive in the system).
On further testing, I think my SSD may be bad (frustrating as that is): I had a Linux-enabled friend try to zero the drive, but the Linux computer didn't recognize it; I put it on my Windows 7 computer (via a USB adapter) and get a message that I have to initialize the disk...and then get a message that "The device is not ready." So I'm going to be calling Transcend to see about a replacement.
Thanks for all the help and patience.
Edited by bauble (01/11/2011 14:19)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348684 - 01/11/2011 14:48
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
If some kind soul can give me instructions for installing the software, I'd be more than happy to try that before giving up and calling Transcend.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348687 - 01/11/2011 16:08
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31602
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
I *thought* it looked garbled. I was afraid it indicated something was wrong. Hyperterminal only mangles the output when you try to use the clipboard (ctrl-C) to copy the diagnostic output. If you use the "capture text" feature it works fine. Look in this FAQ entry here for more details: You can also grab a complete boot log for diagnostic purposes. This is done by Selecting "Transfer, Capture Text" to begin creating the log file, then "Transfer, Capture Text, Stop" when you have captured the desired activity to that file.
Note: Some versions of Hypterterminal, specifically the one that comes with Windows XP, have a severely bug-ridden copy/paste function that scrambles the lines of text as they are copied to the clipboard. If you are trying to capture a boot log for diagnostic purposes, use the Capture Text feature instead.
The reverse is not true, however. If you have been given a list of diagnostic or repair commands to execute at the shell prompt, it is safe (and recommended) that you copy and paste the commands instead of trying to type them. The shell prompt is very sensitive to mistakes in spacing, spelling, and capitalization, and pasting the commands will produce the best results.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348688 - 01/11/2011 16:57
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
|
If some kind soul can give me instructions for installing the software, I'd be more than happy to try that before giving up and calling Transcend. If you can't get it working in a normal PC first, then there's little point in attempting to get it to work in the empeg. FWIW, I think I built mine with Mark's bigdisk builder and then used a Hijack+player upgrade file.
_________________________
-- roger
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348689 - 01/11/2011 17:00
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: tfabris]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
I *had* thought I was familiar with the FAQs. I see now that I was sorely mistaken.
I really do appreciate that you and others have taken the time to create it/them. I'll re-read tonight.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348694 - 01/11/2011 18:10
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: Roger]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
That's kind of what I thought...but I think I've proven that I don't know very much about how this beastie operates, so I was (and am) willing to be corrected).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348700 - 01/11/2011 20:55
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/06/1999
Posts: 7868
|
It is (the only drive in the system). hdb: TS64GSSD25-M, ATA DISK drive Your SSD is set to Slave, instead of Master. You need a jumper to set it to master. Here is the info from the manual for your SSD. *edit* the reason I can tell this is that hdb is the typical Linux designation for a hard drive on the primary IDE bus, as the slave device. hda is the normal primary master device. I don't remember offhand how hardcoded the player software is, but my belief is that the player software (and root fs) needs to be on hda.
Attachments
Edited by drakino (01/11/2011 20:59)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348707 - 02/11/2011 00:53
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: drakino]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
I'd really thought you were on to something, as I'd at one point had the SSD jumpered. I tried again, jumpered once as master and once as slave (thinking that I wanted to cover all/both bases)...no luck. :-(
sigh. I think I'm back to thinking that my SSD is bad.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348712 - 02/11/2011 01:40
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
journeyman
Registered: 23/06/2003
Posts: 57
|
And I've just run the diskbuilder and upgrade on two other drives (one conventional HDD, one SSD (it's only 2GB, but I thought would serve to test)); so I'm thinking, barring the input of those more knowledgeable than I, that my SSD is bad.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348713 - 02/11/2011 02:19
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada
|
The boot log you posted from putty showed a perfectly functional SSD. Linux on the empeg was able to communicate with it, read the IDENTIFY block from the firmware, and read the first sector from the media (partition table).
I see no firm evidence of a broken SSD yet.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#348716 - 02/11/2011 02:30
Re: Error "Bad pump response" occured during stage 0x25
[Re: bauble]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/06/1999
Posts: 7868
|
The disk looks to be built properly based on your logs. What happens when you apply an upgrade file? Try it again (just the upgrade, not the disk builder), with the drive jumped to master. Then post a log again to help us narrow it down.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|