A botnet is attacking my server | Off Topic

You are not logged in. [Log In] empegbbs.com » Forums » General Discussion » Off Topic » A botnet is attacking my server

Page 1 of 2

Topic Options

#313599 - 04/09/2008 15:08 A botnet is attacking my server
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Beginning on August 29 2008, I've noticed a new attack strategy on the SSH server on my Linux gateway box. Until now, I've just left SSH open, but had firewall rules to automatically blacklist any host that tries to connect too often within a short interval. This seems to have been working acceptably until now. But a week ago, a botnet began attacking.. slowly.. a new connection attempt every few seconds, but from a different IP address each time. Up to a limit, after which the IP addresses roll around again, outside of the blacklist rules that I had set. Cute. Anyway, the firewall has now been adjusted to deny drop SSH by default, and I'm moving to a different strategy for remote access there. Long overdue, I suppose. Cheers
Top

#313600 - 04/09/2008 15:12 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
canuckInOR carpal tunnel Registered: 13/02/2002 Posts: 3212 Loc: Portland, OR	Just use a different port?
Top

#313601 - 04/09/2008 15:26 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: canuckInOR]
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Fancier than that. No further comment. -ml
Top

#313602 - 04/09/2008 15:52 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
tman carpal tunnel Registered: 24/12/2001 Posts: 5528	Yeah. Unfortunately this is the way they've gone now. The attackers realised that lots of people have a process that will autoblock any IP that does more than a certain number of invalid attempts. In the end I decided to just disable password entry via SSH and insist on a key only. It will block an IP after the first attempt if it tries to use a password.
Top

#313603 - 04/09/2008 16:03 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: tman]
tonyc carpal tunnel Registered: 27/06/1999 Posts: 7058 Loc: Pittsburgh, PA	Quote: It will block an IP after the first attempt if it tries to use a password. How does one go about setting this up? I have iptables rules to throttle / block attempts, but I also have password authentication turned off and would like to ban any IPs that try it. _________________________ - Tony C my empeg stuff
Top

#313604 - 04/09/2008 16:17 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: tonyc]
tman carpal tunnel Registered: 24/12/2001 Posts: 5528	Originally Posted By: tonyc Quote: It will block an IP after the first attempt if it tries to use a password. How does one go about setting this up? I have iptables rules to throttle / block attempts, but I also have password authentication turned off and would like to ban any IPs that try it. DenyHosts
Top

#313605 - 04/09/2008 16:26 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: tman]
Daria carpal tunnel Registered: 24/01/2002 Posts: 3937 Loc: Providence, RI	Also apparently fail2ban.
Top

#313606 - 04/09/2008 16:29 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: tman]
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Originally Posted By: tman DenyHosts Mmm.. oddly enough, that tool is only a second-level filter, after the firewall. Looks useful, though. Cheers
Top

#313607 - 04/09/2008 16:32 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
tman carpal tunnel Registered: 24/12/2001 Posts: 5528	Originally Posted By: mlord Originally Posted By: tman DenyHosts Mmm.. oddly enough, that tool is only a second-level filter, after the firewall. Yeah. It is after the firewall. It will add entries to hosts.deny dbrashear's suggestion of fail2ban will add an extra firewall rule though.
Top

#313608 - 04/09/2008 16:49 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: tman]
DWallach carpal tunnel Registered: 30/04/2000 Posts: 3810	Alternately, if you want to have fun, you could always shunt them to some kind of honeypot. Or Zork.
Top

#313623 - 04/09/2008 19:04 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: DWallach]
sn00p addict Registered: 24/07/2002 Posts: 618 Loc: South London	Originally Posted By: DWallach Alternately, if you want to have fun, you could always shunt them to some kind of honeypot. Or Zork. My vote would be for: Code: Greetings professor falken. Would you like to play a game?
Top

#313638 - 05/09/2008 00:06 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Well, the attack stopped at 16:36 local time -- I guess the botnet recognizes when there's no response on port 22 (ssh). Curiously though, at 17:27, the firewall rejected a small flurry of twenty or so simultaneous ICMP TYPE=8 packets (from a botnet), and then some ACK-FIN attacks on the SMTP server. Since then, things have been mostly quiet, with just the normal single-host attempts on port 22 (ssh). Such fun!
Top

#313640 - 05/09/2008 00:12 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Originally Posted By: mlord Since then, things have been mostly quiet, with just the normal single-host attempts on port 22 (ssh). Oh, and more or less continuous incoming spam attempts all evening on the SMTP server -- the spamhaus blocklist seems to have rejected just about all of those connections, though.
Top

#313658 - 05/09/2008 13:58 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
drakino carpal tunnel Registered: 08/06/1999 Posts: 7868	Looks like someone is taking advantage of their large botnet to try these attacks. Been hearing from 2 other sources of some pretty heavy attacks lately.
Top

#313937 - 10/09/2008 22:08 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Mmm.. botnet attacking again today, about 3-4 times a minute, from about 07:58am onward. I think I'll now just stop logging the failed SSH attempts, to keep the log file from being rotated too often. Cheers
Top

#316878 - 02/12/2008 21:38 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Mmm.. this type of attack finally made it onto SlashDot and other news sites today.
Top

#316879 - 03/12/2008 01:44 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
DWallach carpal tunnel Registered: 30/04/2000 Posts: 3810	I checked my logs, and sure enough, they're full of these sorts of probes against my ssh daemon. For now, I set it to disable password authentication, which should defeat any of these password-guessing attacks.
Top

#316888 - 03/12/2008 13:01 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: DWallach]
LittleBlueThing addict Registered: 11/01/2002 Posts: 612 Loc: Reading, UK	great source of user ids though _________________________ LittleBlueThing Running twin 30's
Top

#316891 - 03/12/2008 13:03 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: LittleBlueThing]
LittleBlueThing addict Registered: 11/01/2002 Posts: 612 Loc: Reading, UK	I've never got round to port knocking my sshd - I guess it might be time... _________________________ LittleBlueThing Running twin 30's
Top

#316894 - 03/12/2008 13:55 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: LittleBlueThing]
DWallach carpal tunnel Registered: 30/04/2000 Posts: 3810	Amusement: after I set sshd to disallow password authentication, I got this: Quote: Dec 3 09:50:07 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54753]: Invalid user admin from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:09 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54755]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:11 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54757]: Invalid user guest from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:13 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54759]: Invalid user webmaster from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:17 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54763]: Invalid user oracle from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:19 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54765]: Invalid user library from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:22 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54767]: Invalid user info from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:24 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54769]: Invalid user shell from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:26 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54771]: Invalid user linux from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:28 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54773]: Invalid user unix from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:30 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54775]: Invalid user webadmin from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:32 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54782]: Invalid user ftp from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:34 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54784]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:38 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54788]: Invalid user admin from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:40 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54790]: Invalid user guest from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:42 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54792]: Invalid user master from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:50:44 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54794]: Invalid user apache from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:00 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54810]: Invalid user admin from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:02 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54812]: Invalid user admin from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:04 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54814]: Invalid user admin from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:06 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54816]: Invalid user admin from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:12 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54822]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:14 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54824]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:16 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54826]: Invalid user webmaster from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:18 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54828]: Invalid user turbo from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:20 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54830]: Invalid user cvs from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:22 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54832]: Invalid user ram from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:24 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54834]: Invalid user eric from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:26 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54836]: Invalid user wu from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:28 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54838]: Invalid user jesica from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:30 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54840]: Invalid user jessica from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:32 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54842]: Invalid user hsiao from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:34 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54844]: Invalid user chen from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:36 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54846]: Invalid user sam from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:38 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54848]: Invalid user chang from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:40 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54850]: Invalid user alan from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:42 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54852]: Invalid user allan from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:44 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54854]: Invalid user web from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:46 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54856]: Invalid user eva from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:48 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54858]: Invalid user adam from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:50 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54860]: Invalid user postgres from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:52 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54862]: Invalid user postgres from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:54 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54864]: Invalid user sam from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:56 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54866]: Invalid user student from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:51:58 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54868]: Invalid user student from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:00 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54870]: Invalid user student from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:02 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54872]: Invalid user eric from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:04 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54874]: Invalid user fax from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:06 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54876]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:08 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54878]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:10 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54881]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:12 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54883]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:14 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54885]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:16 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54887]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:18 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54889]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:18 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54891]: Invalid user isanne from 201.218.231.142 Dec 3 09:52:18 bunsen-honeydew com.apple.SecurityServer[48]: Failed to authorize right system.login.tty by client /usr/sbin/sshd for authorization created by /usr/sbin/sshd. Dec 3 09:52:18 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54891]: error: PAM: Authentication failure for illegal user isanne from 201.218.231.142 Dec 3 09:52:18 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54891]: Failed keyboard-interactive/pam for invalid user isanne from 201.218.231.142 port 2356 ssh2 Dec 3 09:52:20 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54894]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:22 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54896]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:24 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54898]: Invalid user test from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:26 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54900]: Invalid user info from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:28 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54902]: Invalid user lsmith from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:30 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54904]: Invalid user lsmith from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:32 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54906]: Invalid user dennison from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:34 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54908]: Invalid user dennison from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:36 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54910]: Invalid user chris from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:38 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54912]: Invalid user chriss from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:40 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54914]: Invalid user user from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:42 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54916]: Invalid user username from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:44 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54918]: Invalid user username from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:46 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54920]: Invalid user user from 219.237.242.171 Dec 3 09:52:50 bunsen-honeydew sshd[54924]: Invalid user admin from 219.237.242.171 Suddenly, the request rate jumped radically, from one every few minutes, to one every few seconds, and all from the same IP address. Well, they're nothing if not persistent. Can anybody diagnose the "Failed keyboard-interactive/pam for invalid user" line? After I set PasswordAuthentication to "no", I thought those sorts of things wouldn't happen any more.
Top

#316897 - 03/12/2008 14:25

Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: LittleBlueThing]

mlord
carpal tunnel

Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14496
Loc: Canada

Originally Posted By: LittleBlueThing

I've never got round to port knocking my sshd - I guess it might be time...

Code:

#!/bin/bash
#################################################################################
#
# Disable external SSH by default; require a door-knocker on tcp/$KNOCK to gain access.
#
# The current time-limited ssh_knock list can be viewed at:  /proc/net/ipt_recent/ssh_knock
#
ipt=/sbin/iptables
KNOCK=1234      ## The door-knocker port: pick a nice randomish port number here
SSHLOG="-m limit --limit 30/minute --limit-burst 20 -j LOG --log-prefix"

## ssh_add:  move somebody temporarily to the ssh_knock list.
$ipt -N ssh_add
$ipt -A ssh_add -m recent --name ssh_knock --set $SSHLOG "ssh_add: "  ## add to list
$ipt -A ssh_add -j DROP  ## pretend we ignored it

## ssh_del:  remove an IP from the ssh_knock list.
$ipt -N ssh_del
$ipt -A ssh_del -m recent --name ssh_knock --rsource --remove $SSHLOG "ssh_del: "  ## remove from list
$ipt -A ssh_del -j RETURN  ## return to caller

## ssh_accept:  accept an incoming SSH connection.
$ipt -N ssh_accept
$ipt -A ssh_accept $SSHLOG "CONNECT(ssh): "
$ipt -A ssh_accept -m recent --name ssh_knock --rcheck -j ssh_del   ## remove from list
$ipt -A ssh_accept -j ACCEPT  ## allow this one connection attempt

## ssh_filter:  restrict ssh access to only those hosts on the ssh_knock list, one attempt, 15 seconds max:
$ipt -N ssh_filter
$ipt -A ssh_filter -m recent --name ssh_knock --rcheck --seconds 15 ! --hitcount 1 -j ssh_accept
$ipt -A ssh_filter -m recent --name ssh_knock --rcheck                             -j ssh_del
$ipt -A ssh_filter -j DROP  ## ignore it

$ipt -I INPUT -p tcp --syn --dport $KNOCK -j ssh_add
$ipt -I INPUT -p tcp --syn --dport 22     -j ssh_filter

Edited by mlord (04/12/2008 02:54)
Edit Reason: Fixed $ipt

Top

#316918 - 03/12/2008 17:33 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
Mojo Unregistered	What's the problem if you have a secure password? It's probably more likely that the datacenter or house where your server is located will flood or catch on fire before a bot guesses your user and secure password. They're just trolling for suckers with dictionary passwords. Or am I missing something?
Top

#316919 - 03/12/2008 17:50 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: ]
tman carpal tunnel Registered: 24/12/2001 Posts: 5528	They are just probing but better to not give them the ability to do so at all. Port knocking makes sure that even if there is a vulnerability in SSH then you're safe.
Top

#316920 - 03/12/2008 17:54 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: ]
LittleBlueThing addict Registered: 11/01/2002 Posts: 612 Loc: Reading, UK	You are right of course. But they go away if they can't see you - on a low bandwidth connection this stuff can impact us. Plus it's fun Thanks for the script Mark - I wasn't aware of ipt_recent. I'm working the elements into my firewall - it has been a while since I hacked at it and it is good to remember how it all works... _________________________ LittleBlueThing Running twin 30's
Top

#316929 - 03/12/2008 18:49 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: LittleBlueThing]
LittleBlueThing addict Registered: 11/01/2002 Posts: 612 Loc: Reading, UK	oh... I think ipt=/sbin/iptables should be function ipt() { /sbin/iptables "$@" } or $ipt but thanks for the impetus - I now have a knock-locked cert-only sshd for next time we go skiing and feel the need to vpn back to the webcam aimed at the cats... Edited by LittleBlueThing (03/12/2008 18:50) _________________________ LittleBlueThing Running twin 30's
Top

#316931 - 03/12/2008 19:20 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: DWallach]
DWallach carpal tunnel Registered: 30/04/2000 Posts: 3810	Turns out, to disable password-based access, you need to set: UsePAM no PasswordAuthentication no And, while you're at it, you might as well disable reverse DNS verification, since it's already pretty obvious that all of those hits are attempted security attacks. UseDNS no
Top

#316941 - 03/12/2008 23:32 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: tman]
Mojo Unregistered	Originally Posted By: tman They are just probing but better to not give them the ability to do so at all. Port knocking makes sure that even if there is a vulnerability in SSH then you're safe. Well OK, I suppose it's useful if you're worried about a new SSH vulnerability being found.
Top

#316943 - 04/12/2008 00:07 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: ]
tman carpal tunnel Registered: 24/12/2001 Posts: 5528	Originally Posted By: Mojo Originally Posted By: tman They are just probing but better to not give them the ability to do so at all. Port knocking makes sure that even if there is a vulnerability in SSH then you're safe. Well OK, I suppose it's useful if you're worried about a new SSH vulnerability being found. Exploits have been found. If nothing else, it'll save you from trawling through page after page of invalid attempts in the logs.
Top

#316945 - 04/12/2008 00:53 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: ]
jimhogan carpal tunnel Registered: 06/10/1999 Posts: 2591 Loc: Seattle, WA, U.S.A.	Originally Posted By: Mojo What's the problem if you have a secure password? It's probably more likely that the datacenter or house where your server is located will flood or catch on fire before a bot guesses your user and secure password. They're just trolling for suckers with dictionary passwords. Or am I missing something? If your log files fill up with this kind of scripted probe chaff, you'll never see the one line in that log file that you should pay attention to. This is oversimplification, but allowing log files to be flooded with this kind of stuff makes life more difficult. _________________________ Jim 'Tis the exceptional fellow who lies awake at night thinking of his successes.
Top

#316949 - 04/12/2008 02:53 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: LittleBlueThing]
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Originally Posted By: LittleBlueThing oh... I think ipt=/sbin/iptables should be function ipt() { /sbin/iptables "$@" } or $ipt Duh.. yeah! I clipped it (incompletely) out of a larger version from my rc.firewall: Code: function ipt(){ /sbin/iptables "$@" rc=$? if [ $rc != 0 ]; then echo "FAILED: /sbin/iptables $@" fi }
Top

#316969 - 04/12/2008 18:38 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
LittleBlueThing addict Registered: 11/01/2002 Posts: 612 Loc: Reading, UK	I'm also thinking that the last line (well. after you accept established connections really) should be along the lines of: Code: $ipt -I INPUT -p tcp -m recent --name ssh_knock --remove Otherwise all I need to do is portscan and then ssh in... Also see http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/268 for a multi-port knock using ipt_recent (Which also -I think - has the failing that multiple portscans will open the hole) Edited by LittleBlueThing (04/12/2008 18:39) _________________________ LittleBlueThing Running twin 30's
Top

#316973 - 04/12/2008 20:03 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: LittleBlueThing]
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Originally Posted By: LittleBlueThing I'm also thinking that the last line (well. after you accept established connections really) should be along the lines of: Code: $ipt -I INPUT -p tcp -m recent --name ssh_knock --remove Otherwise all I need to do is portscan and then ssh in... Eh? Plain english, please!
Top

#316977 - 04/12/2008 21:23 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
LittleBlueThing addict Registered: 11/01/2002 Posts: 612 Loc: Reading, UK	I thought it was Well, when ipt sees the IP hit port $KNOCK it jumps to ssh_add That adds the IP to the ssh_knock list If the IP tries port 22 it goes to the ssh_filter which checks if the IP is in the ssh_knock list. If it is then the rule succeeds. What doesn't happen is that the IP is removed from the ssh_knock list if it hits any other port between hitting the $KNOCK port and port 22. So If I do a portscan, hitting ports 1-65534 port 22 opens and stays open for a short while. What you really want is for port 22 to be closed if the IP hits any other port after hitting $KNOCK and before hitting 22. Hmm, even better would be if hitting $KNOCK and !22 put the IP onto a pre-KNOCK DROP blacklist for a short while - that would stop/slow brute force attacks too. _________________________ LittleBlueThing Running twin 30's
Top

#316979 - 04/12/2008 22:47 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: LittleBlueThing]
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Thanks. Gotta be a bit careful there, though, as somebody could be accessing our web server legitimately from the same IP as I'm using to connect to SSH. Say, both of us behind the same hotel/corporate NAT firewall. But yeah, good idea for ports with nothing public on them. Something like this line, after the existing -j ssh_add line: ipt -A INPUT -p tcp --syn -m recent --name ssh_knock --rcheck -j ssh_del Cheers! Edited by mlord (05/12/2008 10:33) Edit Reason: Added --syn for correctness
Top

#316988 - 05/12/2008 08:10 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
LittleBlueThing addict Registered: 11/01/2002 Posts: 612 Loc: Reading, UK	I used -I by mistake since my chain doesn't exist in your example, sorry. Actually I just did: ipt -A tcp_packets -m recent --name ssh_knock --remove which is just what you used but without the logging. In my rules this is at the end of the tcp_packets/tcp_filter list before the default DROP. Ensuring it comes after any 'accept' ports and 'established' should do what you want though. _________________________ LittleBlueThing Running twin 30's
Top

#316990 - 05/12/2008 10:31 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: LittleBlueThing]
mlord carpal tunnel Registered: 29/08/2000 Posts: 14496 Loc: Canada	Originally Posted By: LittleBlueThing Ensuring it comes after any 'accept' ports and 'established' should do what you want though. Yup, that's where it is in the script here now, too. Nice little improvement over the original, that is. Cheers!
Top

#316999 - 05/12/2008 13:27 Re: A botnet is attacking my server [Re: mlord]
DWallach carpal tunnel Registered: 30/04/2000 Posts: 3810	Curiously, the connection attempts on my ssh port have completely stopped. Do you suppose they gave up after I went public-key-auth-only?
Top

Page 1 of 2

Previous Topic

Index

Next Topic