#292512 - 20/01/2007 21:01
Hilary Clinton
|
old hand
Registered: 14/08/2001
Posts: 886
Loc: London, UK
|
Would be interested to know what the Merkins make of her running for the top job. Do you think she'll get it?
Personally, I think it's about time a woman got into the big house.
_________________________
Mk2a RioCar 120Gb - now sold to the owner of my old car
Rio Karma - now on ebay...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292513 - 21/01/2007 01:04
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: furtive]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Quote:
Personally, I think it's about time a woman got into the big house.
Me too, just not *that* woman. Figuring out what Hillary's position on any given issue is damn near impossible with all the pandering and playing both sides of the issues.
There are many more capable women in the national spotlight. it's unfortunate that Hillary's probably the only one that will run in '08.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292514 - 21/01/2007 05:36
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: tonyc]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Agree. Besides which, I don't think a woman could win a popular vote for President in the US yet.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292515 - 21/01/2007 14:03
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: wfaulk]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 19/09/2002
Posts: 2494
Loc: East Coast, USA
|
Sadly, after Bush, I think "Mrs. Slick Willy" could worm her way into the hearts of the public. Maybe I underestimate the power of pig headedness that's apparently in other parts of the country. Regardless, I'd rather see anyone else in the director's chair but her. "Her Slickness" will probably only dodge the nation's issues instead of working them out.
_________________________
- FireFox31 110gig MKIIa (30+80), Eutronix lights, 32 meg stacked RAM, Filener orange gel lens, Greenlights Lit Buttons green set
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292516 - 21/01/2007 22:04
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: furtive]
|
old hand
Registered: 15/02/2002
Posts: 1049
|
Last month's issue of the Atlantic (maybe 2 months ago) had a good article about her. The conclusion was that she basically sold out and became a pandering moderate in order to advance her career and achieve power. I personally thought her agenda of the early Bill administration was extremely misguided, so this is actually a good thing, IMHO. The point of the article, though, was that she's just become another career politician like any other.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292517 - 22/01/2007 02:07
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: furtive]
|
addict
Registered: 04/09/2004
Posts: 525
Loc: Oklahoma
|
Well, keeping in mind her Whitewater escapades (or what ever it was called) her National ID for the world campaign, her references to herself and billy as "We ARE the President..." as well as many other items....I think she fits into politics quite well. Wow! Can you imagaine how F'd we be if she were pres, and Nancy P. was her VP????
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292518 - 22/01/2007 02:11
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: Ladmo]
|
old hand
Registered: 23/07/2003
Posts: 869
Loc: Colorado
|
Quote:
Wow! Can you imagaine how F'd we be if she were pres, and Nancy P. was her VP????
As much as I can't stand her and wouldn't vote for her, we'd be no worse off than we are with W.
_________________________
Dave
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292519 - 22/01/2007 02:41
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: Ladmo]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Quote:
Can you imagaine how F'd we be if she were pres, and Nancy P. was her VP????
Nancy Pelosi would not go anywhere near a HIllary Clinton presidential ticket. Nancy is a genuine progressive Democrat, and while her position as majority leader requires her to hedge just a bit so she can keep the caucus together, she speaks her mind much more than Hillary ever will. Unfortunately, speaking one's mind and having actual positions on issues doesn't seem to play well on the road to the White House.
The good news is that her "San Francisco liberal" voting record happens to line up with what a majority of Americans want these days after a belly full of do-nothing GOP leadership in Congress.. So, the best place for her in 2008 and beyond is where she is right now.
And, riffing off of Dave's comments... I'd take Hillary and Nancy, Beavis and Butthead, or Tango and Cash over Commander Codpiece and Darth Cheney. Nothing, I repeat, NOTHING could be worse than the nitwits that currently constitute the executive branch.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292521 - 22/01/2007 14:27
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: Robotic]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Well, the new Democratically controlled Congress is doing a very good job with their "first 100 hours" plan. Maybe they can keep the speed up and roll back much of the police state legislation that's gone through.
Honestly, I'd really like to see the President and the AG impeached for illegally spying on US citizens.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292522 - 22/01/2007 18:51
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: furtive]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Someone has up an '08 frontrunner quiz. It seems to be reasonably well-researched and accurate.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292523 - 22/01/2007 19:21
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: wfaulk]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12338
Loc: Sterling, VA
|
Quote:
Someone has up an '08 frontrunner quiz. It seems to be reasonably well-researched and accurate.
Two questions:
What does the percentage in the results mean? My top choice has a 100% next to it. I doubt that it means I matched with that candidate 100%, unless the "high, medium, low" qualifiers in the quiz don't mean anything.
Do you perhaps have a link to a similar questionnaire that doesn't bombard me with popups? Even with the Firefox popup blocker, I got two pretty annoying ones, and it looks like it already blocked two.
_________________________
Matt
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292524 - 22/01/2007 19:27
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: Dignan]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 29/08/2000
Posts: 14493
Loc: Canada
|
Quote:
The results are scored on a curve. 100% means that we are 100% certain that the top candidate on your list shares more of the views you indicated than any other candidate.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292525 - 22/01/2007 19:38
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: mlord]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12338
Loc: Sterling, VA
|
Quote:
Quote:
The results are scored on a curve. 100% means that we are 100% certain that the top candidate on your list shares more of the views you indicated than any other candidate.
Ah, gotcha. I didn't want to go back for fear of getting hammered again. I like the idea of the site, but it has a horrible design and it's filled with ads.
_________________________
Matt
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292526 - 22/01/2007 21:22
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: Dignan]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Sorry. I got no ads at all. ( AdBlock Plus w/ EasyList).
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292527 - 22/01/2007 22:36
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: wfaulk]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 20/01/2002
Posts: 2085
Loc: New Orleans, LA
|
Interesting.... I got all republican's leading the list, then all democrats trailing. Nothing like being polar opposites.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#292528 - 22/01/2007 22:54
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: lectric]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/07/1999
Posts: 5549
Loc: Ajijic, Mexico
|
Interesting.... I got all republican's leading the list, then all democrats trailing. Nothing like being polar opposites. Interesting -- I got all Democrats leading the list. Obviously you are some sort of subversive out to utterly destroy the country!  (Juuuusst kidding!) Oh, wait -- it looks like George W. beat you to it.  tanstaafl.
_________________________
"There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292529 - 22/01/2007 23:23
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: tanstaafl.]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 20/01/2002
Posts: 2085
Loc: New Orleans, LA
|
I knew that'd draw a little fire. Hehe, I swear I'm not trolling, either.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292530 - 22/01/2007 23:25
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: lectric]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 20/01/2002
Posts: 2085
Loc: New Orleans, LA
|
Oh, and for the record, I certainly don't agree 100% with Bush (especially on privacy issues), but I guess I line up far more to the right than some.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292531 - 23/01/2007 04:07
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: lectric]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
I took the test again and skewed my answers as far to the right as I could (except for the deficit question -- when did "spend without remorse" become a conservative ideal?) without feeling slimy, basically describing a Republican nominee I wouldn't wig out over, which left me pretty centrist, IMO. Mostly "neithers" with like one or two right answers, plus "civil liberties are important", and I still got almost all Republicans at the top. So you don't have to be very far to the right to "line up" with Republicans.
But it wasn't totally all Republicans then all Democrats. Hagel and McCain were way at the bottom of the list, and Richardson was above a good number of Republicans.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292532 - 23/01/2007 04:49
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: wfaulk]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292533 - 23/01/2007 07:52
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: wfaulk]
|
old hand
Registered: 14/08/2001
Posts: 886
Loc: London, UK
|
I should vote for Sen. Barack Obama apparently.
_________________________
Mk2a RioCar 120Gb - now sold to the owner of my old car
Rio Karma - now on ebay...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292534 - 23/01/2007 13:18
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: furtive]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 10/06/1999
Posts: 5916
Loc: Wivenhoe, Essex, UK
|
Quote:
I should vote for Sen. Barack Obama apparently.
"you are me"
_________________________
Remind me to change my signature to something more interesting someday
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292535 - 23/01/2007 13:44
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: furtive]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/03/2000
Posts: 12338
Loc: Sterling, VA
|
Quote:
I should vote for Sen. Barack Obama apparently.
I also got matched with Obama (we're compatible! we should date!), and I'm happy about that. He's the candidate I agreed with the most already.
The only problem is I do not expect him to have any chance of winning. Not by a longshot.
_________________________
Matt
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292536 - 23/01/2007 18:17
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: tonyc]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Quote:
"The last thing America needs is a radical liberal who supports the war and the death penalty while opposing flag-burning and gay marriage."
Hah! It's funny because it's true!
What I don't get is who is supporting her candidacy?
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292537 - 23/01/2007 23:05
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: wfaulk]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Quote:
What I don't get is who is supporting her candidacy?
1. Partisan Democrats who focus on "electability" over substance.
2. Center-left moderates who think she can snap her fingers and bring back the ghost of Bill Clinton's glory years when we had a surplus budget and weren't mired in an unnecessary war.
3. People who don't follow politics closely enough to understand how banal she really is.
That's all I can think of, really.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292538 - 23/01/2007 23:34
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: tonyc]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 19/01/2002
Posts: 3584
Loc: Columbus, OH
|
A Bible verse, Revelation 3:16, comes to mind: "So because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spew you out of My mouth."
While quoted completely out of context, it describes my feelings for Hillary pretty accurately. I'd rather vote for someone like Obama who, while I don't agree with his politics, seems to at least stand for what he believes in. Hillary simply panders to her current audience and avoids controversy.
_________________________
~ John
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292539 - 24/01/2007 00:35
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: JBjorgen]
|
old hand
Registered: 23/07/2003
Posts: 869
Loc: Colorado
|
Quote:
A Bible verse, Revelation 3:16, comes to mind: "So because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spew you out of My mouth."
Yeah, I can't stand my coffee tepid, either.
_________________________
Dave
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292540 - 24/01/2007 03:19
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: JBjorgen]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 06/10/1999
Posts: 2591
Loc: Seattle, WA, U.S.A.
|
Quote:
A Bible verse, Revelation 3:16, comes to mind: .....
Revelation? Are you sure? I coulda swore it was Monica.
_________________________
Jim
'Tis the exceptional fellow who lies awake at night thinking of his successes.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292541 - 24/01/2007 06:52
Re: Hilary Clinton
[Re: jimhogan]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 13/02/2002
Posts: 3212
Loc: Portland, OR
|
Quote:
Quote:
A Bible verse, Revelation 3:16, comes to mind: .....
Revelation? Are you sure? I coulda swore it was Monica.
Had I been drinking something, it would have just spewn out of my mouth, no matter whether it was hot, cold, or tepid.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index