Quote:
pwned

Quote:

Quote:
pwned

I don't understand. Am I getting old? I mean I know the meaning, but I just don't get it.

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:
pwned

I don't understand. Am I getting old? I mean I know the meaning, but I just don't get it.

Nothing to get, really. It's just a common typo that took on a life of its pwn.

Quote:
Nothing to get, really. It's just a common typo that took on a life of its pwn.

Quote:
Similarly, how to you tell your TiVo not to record World Cup soccer, but still record other soccer games?

Quote:
Similarly, how to you tell your TiVo not to record World Cup soccer, but still record other soccer games?

Quote:
So far I'm very disappointed with this World Cup: I just went to Tesco and the queues seemed just as long as when there isn't an England game on...

Quote:
I remember how everybody was a fan of rugby when we won that.

Quote:
It's not really the game itself that I find totally abhorrent, it's how fscking unbearable we'll be as a country if we win. I remember how everybody was a fan of rugby when we won that.

Quote:
Only found out it was in Germany about 3 weeks ago, so I'm doing well.

Quote:
Anyway, I am part of that even smaller minority of people who are completely uninterested in soccer, so I don't even play it [...] During the world cup I feel like an alien in my own country

Quote:
Umberto Eco must be even more popular aborad that I expected, or you are very informed about Italy

Quote:
he does in Foucault's Pendulum, all those damn chapter epigraphs in different languages with no translations

Quote:
That turned me off him completely, gave me a headache that damn book.

Quote:
He doesn't come across as terribly snobbish in the essays IMO (though he does in Foucault's Pendulum, all those damn chapter epigraphs in different languages with no translations). The breadth of vocabulary is astonishing, though... you find yourself reading his stuff in "the Umberto Eco position": book in one hand, dictionary in the other...

I may be biased against Eco exactly because the Foucault's Pendulum, or maybe this is just something that gets lost in translation, being hidden between the lines in Italian, but I personally find that Eco has an attitude that makes him unpleasant. While he definitely is knowledgeable, he is the prototype of a certain kind of "intellectuals", as they are often referred to, here, who seem to strive for redundant complexity rather than clarity, and confuse erudition, or simple factual knowledge of things, with "culture", so that "the more you quote, the better you are".
There's nothing bad, in principle, in having to read a book holding a dictionary in the other hand (and that's what I did too when reading the Faucault's Pendulum, which I never finished either), but I seem to read in Eco's writings his desire to tell the known universe how much he knows, rather than bringing knowledge to the reader, if not pleasure of reading, not to mention the joy of experiencing written art. As you said, the really good story is buried deep.

He definitely uses an extraordinary vocabulary but... is he a good writer? In my opinion, not so much. He probably wants to be our contemporary Dante (haha!), but miseably fails at that. I believe many consider him a great author just because of his complexity, which to me is, in the end, just naive.

Of course, many Italians would disagree with me.

Quote:
he is the prototype of a certain kind of "intellectuals", as they are often referred to, here, who seem to strive for redundant complexity rather than clarity, and confuse erudition, or simple factual knowledge of things, with "culture", so that "the more you quote, the better you are".